Factual disputes are always better than disputing “account not mine”, especially if the account is really yours. Examine the tradeline closely, there is no doubt you can find a factual error or two, or three.
To find factual errors go through the negative tradeline and list every error, inaccuracy, incomplete or false thing you find.
Request the credit bureau delete the negative tradeline, not make a correction. Corrected negative information is still negative.
The E-Oscar Investigation Method
Because the CRA’s utilize the E-Oscar method of investigation, a consumer dispute is reduced to a two-digit code. This code supposedly best describes the dispute issue. What the code really does is reduce the CRA’s time in processing disputes and eliminates the FCRA requirement for the dispute to be investigated.
Finding factual errors causes the CRA’s to do their job properly. Frustrate the CRA’s to the point they will follow the FCRA and actually investigate a dispute or even better, frustrate them to the point they will delete the negative tradeline.
How to find factual errors in collection account listings
- Account reporting as “Open.” Collection accounts are not open tradelines as if you applied for the account and they as debt collectors extended you credit. If this were the case, they would have to be licensed in your State as a consumer bank, lender or finance company.
- Account reporting “One Month Term”. Again, what terms and agreements did you sign and agree to when the debt collector purchased the debt? None. Collection accounts should not have one month terms.
- Account reporting as “120 days late”. How can this be? Collection accounts are not like original creditor accounts. You did not open an account with a collection agency and promise to pay monthly payments.
- Account is reporting as an “Installment”. Again, what terms and agreements did you sign and agree to when the debt collector purchased the debt? None. Is the debt collector posing as a bank, lender or finance company? Collection accounts should not have installment agreements.
- Account “ balance” or the “high balance” is incorrect.
- Many collection agencies pose as Data Factoring Companies. Even if the CRA’s allow this deception, you did not open a “data factoring account” with them. This is not a “data factoring account.”
- The date the collection account will be removed is not the same as the date the original creditor is reporting.
- The date of first delinquency with the original creditor is not reporting and according to the FCRA, Section 623, “…A person who furnishes information to a consumer reporting agency regarding a delinquent account being placed for collection, charged to profit or loss, or subjected to any similar action shall, not later than 90 days after furnishing the information, notify the agency of the date of delinquency on the account, which shall be the month and year of the commencement of the delinquency on the account that immediately preceded the action.”
You will probably find more than one factual dispute; however, do not list all of them in one dispute letter. Save some for later in case you do not get the desired result on your first round of dispute letters. Disputing negative tradelines based upon factual errors may eliminate the CRA’s excuse of “previously investigated” notation.
It may not work every time but you will find you can get a lot more mileage out of dispute letters containing factual errors whether than disputing “not mine” only to have the investigation results come back verified.
After disputing using factual errors, as a last resort, request the method of verification. Request the CRA give you the following: (a) The name of the creditor; (b) the person’s name they verified the dispute with; (c) the address; (d) the telephone number; and (e) the documentation used to verify the dispute. There could be negative consequences to your credit score by disputing collection accounts so it is important to read “What you should know before disputing a collection account.”
Consider allowing a professional repair your credit. Lexington Law helped clients remove 1,297,226 negative items in 2010 alone which included collection accounts. Other methods can be used to get rid of collection accounts such as debt validation, settle the debt and even pay for deletion of a collection account.